In 2010 Tea Party favorite Sam Brownback was elected governor and he had Republican majorities in both houses of its legislature. The GOP program was put in place. What happened, you ask?
The result of the GOP tax cuts is significantly lower employment growth than in the national economy. By the way, lower income tax and higher sales taxes, a very regressive tax policy, has led to a persistent overestimation of revenue, and tax shortfalls that led to spending cuts, which in part explains the employment problems (see here). And that is essentially the same program that the 3 national candidates are defending this year. Supply-side economics has been debunked several times, but it surprisingly survives. Zombienomics.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The second coming of Trumponomics
Donald Trump will be the first president since Grover Cleveland, also a New Yorker, to have two non consecutive terms in the presidency. The...
-
"Where is Everybody?" The blog will continue here for announcements, messages and links to more substantive pieces. But those will...
-
There are Gold Bugs and there are Bitcoin Bugs. They all oppose fiat money (hate the Fed and other monetary authorities) and follow some s...
-
By Sergio Cesaratto (Guest Blogger) “The fact that individual countries no longer have their own currencies and central banks will put n...
Why do you think such a simple graph constitutes a debunking? Many different factors affect economic growth.
ReplyDeleteThe simple graph alone doesn't of course. But it does provide good visual aid ;)
DeleteNote that this claim that cutting taxes leads to higher revenue (which clearly failed in Kansas where revenue has fallen short all the time) is the central story. Of course if you are forced to cut spending, employment cannot grow much.