In 2010 Tea Party favorite Sam Brownback was elected governor and he had Republican majorities in both houses of its legislature. The GOP program was put in place. What happened, you ask?
The result of the GOP tax cuts is significantly lower employment growth than in the national economy. By the way, lower income tax and higher sales taxes, a very regressive tax policy, has led to a persistent overestimation of revenue, and tax shortfalls that led to spending cuts, which in part explains the employment problems (see here). And that is essentially the same program that the 3 national candidates are defending this year. Supply-side economics has been debunked several times, but it surprisingly survives. Zombienomics.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Was Bob Heilbroner a leftist?
Janek Wasserman, in the book I commented on just the other day, titled The Marginal Revolutionaries: How Austrian Economists Fought the War...
-
There are Gold Bugs and there are Bitcoin Bugs. They all oppose fiat money (hate the Fed and other monetary authorities) and follow some s...
-
By Sergio Cesaratto (Guest Blogger) “The fact that individual countries no longer have their own currencies and central banks will put n...
-
I was interviewed by Max Jerneck for his podcast, and he alerted me to this figure (see below), which apparently come from the Universidad ...
Why do you think such a simple graph constitutes a debunking? Many different factors affect economic growth.
ReplyDeleteThe simple graph alone doesn't of course. But it does provide good visual aid ;)
DeleteNote that this claim that cutting taxes leads to higher revenue (which clearly failed in Kansas where revenue has fallen short all the time) is the central story. Of course if you are forced to cut spending, employment cannot grow much.