Thursday, June 13, 2013

O sacred hunger of pernicious gold! What bands of faith can impious lucre hold?

Sociologist Geoffrey Ingham has written a review of David Graeber's Debt: The First 5,000 Years, which can be viewed here (subscription required). According to Ingham, while Graeber's monumental inquiry is much to be admired, there is quite a bit of room for critical refutation, specifically with respect to the exact nature of money, and its essence as a moral base for economic life.
By -
Labels: , , , , ,

1 comment:

  1. Matias VernengoJune 13, 2013 at 8:53 AM

    Robin Blackburn review is freely available here http://newleftreview.org/II/79/robin-blackburn-finance-for-anarchists, in which he says that Graeber draws "on Geoffrey Ingham’s explanations of the origins of money."

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

More on MMT in the Tropics: or Can exchange rate instability, and zero interest rates, guarantee prosperity in the periphery?

  Lance Taylor, Wynne Godley and myself in March 1999 Back in the 1990s (from late 1996 to early 1999 to be precise), I worked for Wynne Go...

  • A reply to Wray - Part I
    By Sergio Cesaratto (Guest Blogger) “The fact that individual countries no longer have their own currencies and central banks will put n...
  • Hyperinflation in Bitcoinland
    There are Gold Bugs and there are  Bitcoin Bugs. They all oppose fiat money (hate the Fed and other monetary authorities) and follow some s...
  • Blog Moving to Substack (and first post)
    "Where is Everybody?" The blog will continue here for announcements, messages and links to more substantive pieces. But those will...