Thursday, June 13, 2013

O sacred hunger of pernicious gold! What bands of faith can impious lucre hold?

Sociologist Geoffrey Ingham has written a review of David Graeber's Debt: The First 5,000 Years, which can be viewed here (subscription required). According to Ingham, while Graeber's monumental inquiry is much to be admired, there is quite a bit of room for critical refutation, specifically with respect to the exact nature of money, and its essence as a moral base for economic life.
By -
Labels: , , , , ,

1 comment:

  1. Matias VernengoJune 13, 2013 at 8:53 AM

    Robin Blackburn review is freely available here http://newleftreview.org/II/79/robin-blackburn-finance-for-anarchists, in which he says that Graeber draws "on Geoffrey Ingham’s explanations of the origins of money."

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Surplus approach, Historical Materialism, and precapitalist economies:

New Paper by Sergio Cesaratto on a topic closely related to what he has discussed here before. From the abstract: In the classical economis...

  • Hyperinflation in Bitcoinland
    There are Gold Bugs and there are  Bitcoin Bugs. They all oppose fiat money (hate the Fed and other monetary authorities) and follow some s...
  • A reply to Wray - Part I
    By Sergio Cesaratto (Guest Blogger) “The fact that individual countries no longer have their own currencies and central banks will put n...
  • Blog Moving to Substack (and first post)
    "Where is Everybody?" The blog will continue here for announcements, messages and links to more substantive pieces. But those will...