Tuesday, July 26, 2011

What ended the Great Depression?


Conventional wisdom contends that fiscal policy was of secondary importance to the economic recovery in the 1930s. The recovery is then connected to monetary policy that allowed non-sterilized gold inflows to increase the money supply. Often, this is shown by measuring the fiscal multipliers, and demonstrating that they were relatively small. This working paper shows that problems with the conventional measures of fiscal multipliers in the 1930s may have created an incorrect consensus on the irrelevance of fiscal policy. The rehabilitation of fiscal policy is seen as a necessary step in the reinterpretation of the positive role of New Deal policies for the recovery.

2 comments:

  1. Thus study is a masterpiece. It should win a Nobel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not really. Nobel's often suck. But at any rate, just reasonable stuff in an age of crazy nuts. Thanks anyways.

    ReplyDelete

Milei and real wages in Argentina

I was interviewed by Max Jerneck for his podcast, and he alerted me to this figure (see below), which apparently come from the Universidad ...