Bob Solow on rents and decoupling of productivity and wages -- Branko Milanovic discussing Solow's recent ideas on the political element in distribution. Pablo Bortz suggested the post, but I must note that it falls short of understanding the limitations of the marginalist approach. My views are closer to Pivetti's Sraffian monetary theory of distribution.
Sunday, May 3, 2015
On the blogs
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Milei's Psycho Shock Therapy
My short piece for Dollars & Sense on Milei's economic program is out now, here . An early version is available here . Btw, this is...
-
"Where is Everybody?" The blog will continue here for announcements, messages and links to more substantive pieces. But those will...
-
There are Gold Bugs and there are Bitcoin Bugs. They all oppose fiat money (hate the Fed and other monetary authorities) and follow some s...
-
By Sergio Cesaratto (Guest Blogger) “The fact that individual countries no longer have their own currencies and central banks will put n...
What I highlighted in Milanovic's post is that, whatever its shortcomings, he gets the "open system" nature of the Sraffian approach, in this short line: "neo-Ricardians who simply argued that the distribution between w and r can take place at any point along the w-r frontier: it is entirely politically determined."
ReplyDeleteHe says that the Solow story is interesting because it provides: "a 'marriage' between a standard neoclassical view of how income shares of capital and labor are determined (because even if they are determined in a kind of a monopolistic competition, this is still handled by the neoclassical production function), and the distribution of the rent that responds only in part to economic, and mostly to political factors." Can't have both.
ReplyDelete