Skip to main content

What's in a name? that which we call Naked Keynesianism

Someone asked me this week why the blog is named Naked Keynesianism. It was in the very first post in February 2011. The story was on Fox News, about what Jamie Galbraith was teaching his students. Naked Keynesianism! And that seemed the perfect title for the blog.
At the end of the day, names do not matter, the content is what is relevant, but the Fixed News 'journalists' turn out to show a lot about the true content of their views. What was the line? "What’s in a name? that which we call a rose; by any other name would smell as sweet." For Fixed News Keynesianism does NOT smell like roses.

Comments

  1. Matias,

    Bob Murphy has a post up in which he argues that the capital debates show that mainstream econ is wrong and that Austrian economics is right. Perhaps you could have a look, and explain what's wrong with his argument:

    http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2014/Murphycapital.html#footnote2

    http://consultingbyrpm.com/blog/2014/05/the-importance-of-capital-in-economic-theory.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. those two posts don't explicitly mention the capital debates, but the basic argument about capital comes from there. In this previous post he mentions the capital debates in relation to Piketty:

      "Some Background on Capital Controversy

      I am going to be putting out stuff in the coming month on why Thomas Piketty’s use of a neoclassical aggregate production function is so dubious–Austrians and Post-Keynesians agree–but if you just can’t bear the suspense, here are three links.." etc"

      http://consultingbyrpm.com/blog/2014/04/some-background-on-capital-controversy.html

      Delete
    2. Will try later today. It's an obvious mistake. Austrian theory of capital is not different in essence that other marginalist views. Thanks for the tip.

      Delete
    3. this paper explains Murphy's austrian argument in more detail, with reference to the capital debates:

      http://mises.org/journals/scholar/Murphy7.pdf

      Delete
  2. Wrong! It's The Giant Keynes Head Website (TGKHW)!

    I even just recently made a video tribute:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zsXUDQXKuQ

    I have to get my inspirational from somewhere. ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. that head is pretty giant.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the 'Classical Dichotomy'?

A few brief comments on Brexit and the postmortem of the European Union

Another end of the world is possible
There will be a lot of postmortems for the European Union (EU) after Brexit. Many will suggest that this was a victory against the neoliberal policies of the European Union. See, for example, the first three paragraphs of Paul Mason's column here. And it is true, large contingents of working class people, that have suffered with 'free-market' economics, voted for leaving the union. The union, rightly or wrongly, has been seen as undemocratic and responsible for the economics woes of Europe.

The problem is that while it is true that the EU leaders have been part of the problem and have pursued the neoliberal policies within the framework of the union, sometimes with treaties like the Fiscal Compact, it is far from clear that Brexit and the possible demise of the union, if the fever spreads to France, Germany and other countries with their populations demanding their own referenda, will lead to the abandonment of neoliberal policies. Aust…

A brief note on Venezuela and the turn to the right in Latin America

So besides the coup in Brazil (which was all but confirmed by the last revelations, if you had any doubts), and the electoral victory of Macri in Argentina, the crisis in Venezuela is reaching a critical level, and it would not be surprising if the Maduro administration is recalled, even though right now the referendum is not scheduled yet.

The economy in Venezuela has collapsed (GDP has fallen by about 14% or so in the last two years), inflation has accelerated (to three digit levels; 450% or so according to the IMF), there are shortages of essential goods, recurrent energy blackouts, and all of these aggravated by persistent violence. Contrary to what the press suggests, these events are not new or specific to left of center governments. Similar events occurred in the late 1980s, in the infamous Caracazo, when the fall in oil prices caused an external crisis, inflation, and food shortages, which eventually, after the announcement of a neoliberal economic package that included the i…