Sunday, June 9, 2013

Ronald Reagan, the Tea Party, and the Reasons for Recurrent Crises

A follow up on the last post. If FDR and his promise of the Economic Bill of Rights would have implied a completion of the New Deal, it is quite obvious that Reagan was the undoing of it. But that's often not recognized. Bill Maher's new rules last Friday got it right.
Yes Reagan was the original tea bagger, and income inequality, lower growth and more financial instability are the result of his administration. Dean Baker has said that, in a more technical way if you will, in his book The United States Since 1980.

1 comment:

  1. Another great book is Michael Meeropol's 'Surrender: How the Clinton Administration completed the Reagan Revolution'

    ReplyDelete

Inequality and Stagnation by Policy Design

By Thomas Palley (guest blogger) This paper argues the mainstream economics profession is threatened by theories of the financial crisis a...