A follow up on the last post. If FDR and his promise of the Economic Bill of Rights would have implied a completion of the New Deal, it is quite obvious that Reagan was the undoing of it. But that's often not recognized. Bill Maher's new rules last Friday got it right.
Yes Reagan was the original tea bagger, and income inequality, lower growth and more financial instability are the result of his administration. Dean Baker has said that, in a more technical way if you will, in his book The United States Since 1980.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are we on the verge of a debt crisis?
This was my presentation at the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) last summer. I was supposed to revise it, but never found the ti...
-
"Where is Everybody?" The blog will continue here for announcements, messages and links to more substantive pieces. But those will...
-
By Sergio Cesaratto (Guest Blogger) “The fact that individual countries no longer have their own currencies and central banks will put n...
-
There are Gold Bugs and there are Bitcoin Bugs. They all oppose fiat money (hate the Fed and other monetary authorities) and follow some s...
Another great book is Michael Meeropol's 'Surrender: How the Clinton Administration completed the Reagan Revolution'
ReplyDelete