Skip to main content

Duménil and Lévy and the Apotheosis of Capital

Graph below from Duménil and Lévy's (D&L) The Crisis of Neoliberalism (p. 61) [my previous post on their book here].
Note that contrary to the Fed's base rate, which is negative in real terms, the rates paid by corporations are relatively high. Note that firms my borrow to finance, not production, but to buy back stock and pay dividends, and enrich stockholders, including management. That's what happened according to D&L (see below, p. 62).
In other words, on average higher rates of interest (even if lower in periods of financial crises) sustain redistribution towards fat cats. The opposite of Keynes' euthanasia of the rentier indeed.

Comments

  1. Matías,

    I've been meaning to ask you this for a while, and as you touched the subject I think it's okay to ask.

    What are your thoughts about Duménil and Lévy? Do you find "The Crisis of Neoliberalism" convincing?

    What about John Bellamy Foster and Robert W. W. McChesney's "The Endless Crisis"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Magpie. In all fairness, I never quite agreed with any of D&L ideas. They tend to see everything from a profit-led prism, which I don't find logically sound or empirically convincing. Having said that, they do provide a well of data that is useful on its own, and they hold a political position that is compatible with my broad views on capitalism and neoliberal policies.

      Delete
  2. Hm. I see the point, but I also get the impression that in the current universe ANY rate of interest will sustain redistribution to fat cats. So long as borrowing in order to speculate is possible, then speculation is the way that things will go. Either the borrowing needs strings, or the speculation should have obstacles. I go with putting obstacles on speculation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suppose there is a reason why owls are a symbol of wisdom. Nothing to add.

      Delete
  3. Magpie, Owl, I'm waiting for your comments Hawk!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not much to say, really. A lot to think, though.

      But what about Bellamy Foster and McChesney?

      PS, it seems birds of a feather do flock together...

      Delete
    2. Sorry for the delay in replying. I'm more favorable overall to the Monthly Review crowd. I particularly liked Paul Sweezy, and his book on Marx, The Theory of Capitalist Development (1942) seems to be amongst the best (both for his use of Bortkiewicz and his emphasis on realization crisis. Mind sometimes the profit-led closure also appears in their models.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A few brief comments on Brexit and the postmortem of the European Union

Another end of the world is possible
There will be a lot of postmortems for the European Union (EU) after Brexit. Many will suggest that this was a victory against the neoliberal policies of the European Union. See, for example, the first three paragraphs of Paul Mason's column here. And it is true, large contingents of working class people, that have suffered with 'free-market' economics, voted for leaving the union. The union, rightly or wrongly, has been seen as undemocratic and responsible for the economics woes of Europe.

The problem is that while it is true that the EU leaders have been part of the problem and have pursued the neoliberal policies within the framework of the union, sometimes with treaties like the Fiscal Compact, it is far from clear that Brexit and the possible demise of the union, if the fever spreads to France, Germany and other countries with their populations demanding their own referenda, will lead to the abandonment of neoliberal policies. Aust…

A brief note on Venezuela and the turn to the right in Latin America

So besides the coup in Brazil (which was all but confirmed by the last revelations, if you had any doubts), and the electoral victory of Macri in Argentina, the crisis in Venezuela is reaching a critical level, and it would not be surprising if the Maduro administration is recalled, even though right now the referendum is not scheduled yet.

The economy in Venezuela has collapsed (GDP has fallen by about 14% or so in the last two years), inflation has accelerated (to three digit levels; 450% or so according to the IMF), there are shortages of essential goods, recurrent energy blackouts, and all of these aggravated by persistent violence. Contrary to what the press suggests, these events are not new or specific to left of center governments. Similar events occurred in the late 1980s, in the infamous Caracazo, when the fall in oil prices caused an external crisis, inflation, and food shortages, which eventually, after the announcement of a neoliberal economic package that included the i…

What is the 'Classical Dichotomy'?