Skip to main content

Not so Keen on Krugman

I have been critical of the theoretical positions held by Krugman for a while now, even if he and DeLong, and even Summers, have been useful for policy reasons. Now a lengthy debate between Krugman and Steve Keen, a very pragmatic and reasonable post-Keynesian (and I guess part of MMT tradition) that understands endogenous money has developed [a good summary with all the links here].

First, and foremost endogenous money implies that the rate of interest is exogenous and determined by monetary authorities. That per se is not necessarily in contradiction with a neoclassical/marginalist view according to which the rate of interest equilibrates investment to full employments savings, as Krugman clearly believes. Wicksell [see here] certainly did not think so either.

For Wicksell in a giro system, in which all transactions were recorded as debit/credit relations, credit could expand indefinitely, but in the real world, bank reserves would vanish and lending would eventually collapse if the bank rate remained below the natural rate for a long period. That is fundamentally the reason why Krugman does not understand the notion that banks can create reserves, and that loans cause deposits. In other words, what regulates the bank rate is, ultimately the natural rate of interest.

Further, the natural rate of interest is NOT a banking phenomenon in marginalist analysis, and, as a result, cannot be exogenous to the system. It results from the marginal productivity of capital and the intertemporal decisions of consumers. Krugman is in fact very clear that he supports the loanable funds theory of interest.

Hence, Peter Cooper is correct to point out that ultimately the debate with Keen must revolve around a notion of a long term normal rate of interest that is institutionally determined by the central bank independent of the marginalist notion of the natural rate. That can only be obtained with the proper critique of the neoclassical notion of capital.

Comments

  1. What do you make of Keen's efforts to formalize the PK position?

    Also, in a pure credit money system without a central bank, how would the interest rate be determined? Purely by convention. (That is not a rhetorical question -- pure convention might be right.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not sure I follow all his arguments to tell you the truth. Too many posts to follow, and some fall outside the issue of endogenous money. My concern is that many post-Keynesians do not understand the importance of the capital debates for a proper debunking of mainstream economics (not saying that is the case with Keen, by the way). The whole discussion on DSGE models is a bit of a distraction. DSGE models are just one version, an intertemporal one, of the marginalist model. Problems are common to all types of marginalist analysis when it comes to the notion of capital.

    Interest rates before the appearance of central banks, first one being the Sveriges Riksbank in 1668, were fundamentally determined exogenously by lenders. Homer and Sylla's History of Interest Rates has a lot of interesting data. In other words, institutional factors were always relevant, and the idea that interest rates are regulated by the productivity of capital and the preferences of consumers is hard too prove. By the way, it is a neoclassical proposition so THEY have the burden of proof.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My instincts would be to say that interest rates, like any other price, reflect power relations and bargaining positions - not just consumer desires and the actual productivity of capital.

      Delete
  3. Bravo! At last someone puts things into perspective

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dirk Bezemer at INET is another Keen-type:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEg2pUPgEOM

      Delete
  4. And, as always there is the specification of whether the institutional structure includes a fixed or floating exchange rate policy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for the link Barry. Dirk your instincts would be correct. Warren in either scenario (fix or flex) Krugman would still think that the interest rate is regulated by the productivity of capital and the intertemporal decisions of consumers. What would change is the adjustment of the balance of payments.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the 'Classical Dichotomy'?

A few brief comments on Brexit and the postmortem of the European Union

Another end of the world is possible
There will be a lot of postmortems for the European Union (EU) after Brexit. Many will suggest that this was a victory against the neoliberal policies of the European Union. See, for example, the first three paragraphs of Paul Mason's column here. And it is true, large contingents of working class people, that have suffered with 'free-market' economics, voted for leaving the union. The union, rightly or wrongly, has been seen as undemocratic and responsible for the economics woes of Europe.

The problem is that while it is true that the EU leaders have been part of the problem and have pursued the neoliberal policies within the framework of the union, sometimes with treaties like the Fiscal Compact, it is far from clear that Brexit and the possible demise of the union, if the fever spreads to France, Germany and other countries with their populations demanding their own referenda, will lead to the abandonment of neoliberal policies. Aust…

A brief note on Venezuela and the turn to the right in Latin America

So besides the coup in Brazil (which was all but confirmed by the last revelations, if you had any doubts), and the electoral victory of Macri in Argentina, the crisis in Venezuela is reaching a critical level, and it would not be surprising if the Maduro administration is recalled, even though right now the referendum is not scheduled yet.

The economy in Venezuela has collapsed (GDP has fallen by about 14% or so in the last two years), inflation has accelerated (to three digit levels; 450% or so according to the IMF), there are shortages of essential goods, recurrent energy blackouts, and all of these aggravated by persistent violence. Contrary to what the press suggests, these events are not new or specific to left of center governments. Similar events occurred in the late 1980s, in the infamous Caracazo, when the fall in oil prices caused an external crisis, inflation, and food shortages, which eventually, after the announcement of a neoliberal economic package that included the i…