Gary Gorton and Andrew Metrick have just produced a survey on the vast literature on what happened during the last financial crisis (and to a lesser extent why it did) titled “Getting Up To Speed on the Financial Crisis,” to be published by the Journal of Economic Literature. They used only 16 documents, between papers from ‘top journals,’ reports and speeches and congressional testimonies. It must be noted that the objective of the review is to provide “a one-weekend-reader’s guide” to the crisis.Read the rest here.
The biggest problem with their paper is not the limited number of documents reviewed, which seem to be fairly representative of conventional views on the financial crisis, but the limitations of what the mainstream of the profession knows about the crisis, and worse, what the profession clearly does not know it does not know, the unknown unknowns, so to speak. And that is why ignoring heterodox and progressive contributions has been very harmful for the profession.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Reviewing the reviewers of the crisis
From Triplecrisis:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The World Upsidedown: Progressives and the Return of the Victorian Policy Consensus
Eminent Victorian? The complete shitshow that US trade policy has become has led to a paradoxical result. Many progressive critics of Fr...
-
There are Gold Bugs and there are Bitcoin Bugs. They all oppose fiat money (hate the Fed and other monetary authorities) and follow some s...
-
By Sergio Cesaratto (Guest Blogger) “The fact that individual countries no longer have their own currencies and central banks will put n...
-
Teaching on the capital debates this and last week. So here are some thoughts, based on my class notes and the required readings (see below)...
No comments:
Post a Comment